Saturday, October 5, 2013

Czechoslovakia and the Velvet Revolution




                The year 1989 meant a time for change for many different people across the world. From Europe to South America, countries were changing, and people were revolting. As Krishan Kumar quoted in his document, The Revolutions of 1989: Socialism, Capitalism, and Democracy, “’Socialism is dead,’ agreed Ralf Dahrendorf…‘communism is gone, never to return,’” (Kumar 309). 

                Kumar follows through with his statement about the death of socialism with the theory that this death of socialism is coupled with the search for utopia. He argues that if utopia was then known as socialism, then the death of socialism must mean the death of utopia. But nonetheless, a utopian society was essential for a community.

                Vaclav Havel even stresses the importance of a utopian society. In his document, Power of the Powerless, he states that, “for what else are parallel structures than an area where a different life can be lived, a life that is in harmony with its own aims and which in turn structures itself in harmony with those aims?” (Kenney 27-28). Havel describes his theory or parallel structures in which a parallel polis results from a second culture of an independent and repressed culture. He essentially says that through independence and release from repression, a community can live in peace and harmony with one another. 

                Havel played an important role in the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia. He was transformed from a playwright to the President of a new democratic Czechoslovakia. The movie, The Power of the Powerless follows the journey of the Velvet Revolution and the rise to power of Vaclav Havel.

                On November 17, 1989, a communist-sanctioned commemoration of the 50th anniversary of Jan Opletal’s death was being held (Kurtz 1). Opletal was murdered by Nazi forces and was a symbol of Czech resistance. After this ceremony ended, protesters moved into downtown Prague towards Wenceslas Square. They were soon stopped and beaten by riot police. 

                Havel held a meeting with Charter 77, which resulted in the creation of Civic Forum, an organization that held public demonstrations (Kurtz 1). This group was responsible for the riot of Czech citizens shaking their keys as a method to end the regime. With the many protests and demonstrations held, eleven days after the initial November 17th riot was held, drastic changes were made. These changes are as follows:

  • The resignation of the whole Politburo
  • The creation of a compromise government
  • The establishment of a democratic government

                The Power of the Powerless film was very helpful in guiding me through the events that took place in the Velvet Revolution. As I’ve said before, actual footage and eyewitness accounts make the events and actions seem more real to me since I obviously was not there myself. Just hearing about it firsthand and seeing what was going on really sticks with me. There was one part of the film where a couple of Czech students were discussing the Velvet Revolution. They said that it disheartens them whenever they talk about the Velvet Revolution and other people don’t really know what that is. I mean, that is such a major event for their country, and some people don’t even know about it. That would depress me, too! That would be like people in America not knowing about World War II, or the signing of the Declaration of Independence.


                To continue with Kumar’s document, he states that Czechoslovakia, along with many other countries, “had socialism imposed on them by military force from outside, [and] all show the desire to return to old symbols of nationhood,” (Kumar 318). Czechoslovakia, in this instance, did not want to be under the influence of communism or socialism. They simply wanted a peaceful change to democracy, like many other countries. But, in order to do so, a revolution had to be established to knock out the old regime.

                Kumar further investigates the similarities between both the 1989 and the 1848 revolutions. Both were “revolution[s] of the intellectuals,” led by poets, musicians, philosophers, and professors (Kumar 325). The revolutions of 1848 brought up questions about nationality and class that resurfaced in 1989. Polish and Czechoslovakian cultures collided in 1848, and were brought back again in 1989. So, Kumar makes the point that history repeats itself, and people must learn from it.

                Kumar also notes that Czechoslovakia’s Charter 77 during the Velvet Revolution, along with the “democratic opposition” in Hungary and Solidarity in Poland, shared many of the same characteristics (Kumar 330). They all shared wide-range activities (samizdat publishing, political discussions in public settings, and trade-union organizations).

              
                 In all, the revolutions of 1989 and the Velvet Revolution of Czechoslovakia had a lasting effect on the countries involved. The move to new governments through large social organizations and riots brought the people together to achieve one common goal: utopia.
               

~*~

Kenney, Padraic. 1989: Democratic Revolutions at the Cold War's End : A Brief History with Documents. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2010. Print.

Kumar, Krishan. "The Revolutions of 1989: Socialism, Capitalism, and Democracy." Theory and Society 21.3 (1992): 309-56. Web. 8 Aug. 2013. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/657580>.

Kurtz, Lester R., Ph.D. "Czechoslovakia's Velvet Revolution." International Center on Nonviolent Conflict (2008): 1-6. Print.


No comments:

Post a Comment